Baha'u'llah


Moreover, observe how these things that have come to pass, and the acts which have been perpetrated, have all been mentioned in former traditions.  Even as it hath been recorded in the "Rawdiy-i-Káfí," concerning "Zawrá'." In the "Rawdiy-i-Káfí" it is related of Mu'ávíyih, son of Vahháb, that Abú-'Abdi'lláh hath spoken: "Knowest thou Zawrá'?"  I said: "May my life be a sacrifice unto thee! They say it is Baghdád." "Nay," he answered. And then added: "Hast thou entered the city of Rayy?",1 to which I made reply: "Yea, I have entered it."  Whereupon, He enquired: "Didst thou visit the cattle-market?" "Yea," I answered. He said: "Hast thou seen the black mountain on the right hand side of the road? The same is Zawrá'. There shall eighty men, of the children of certain ones, be slain, all of whom are worthy to be called caliphs."  "Who will slay them?" I asked.  He made reply: "The children of Persia!"

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

notes from the Guardian

Here is a portion of a text from the Guardian (Shoghi Effendi): No Guardian of the Faith, I feel it my solemn duty to place on record, can ever claim to be the perfect exemplar of the teachings of Bahá'u'lláh or the stainless mirror that reflects His light. Though overshadowed by the unfailing, the unerring protection of Bahá'u'lláh and of the Báb, and however much he may share with `Abdu'l-Bahá the right and obligation to interpret the Bahá'í teachings, he remains essentially human and cannot, if he wishes to remain faithful to his trust, arrogate to himself, under any pretense whatsoever, the rights, the privileges and prerogatives which Bahá'u'lláh has chosen to confer upon His Son (...) *          *          * Some writings that I have read place the blame on Shoghi Effendi on lack of LGBT rights.  This is understandable, but please hear me out.  Shoghi Effendi died in 1957.  But in the United States anyway, homosexuality was not given by t
Read more

agreement

So, here's a little nugget I found: The fourth principle declares that religion must be in conformity to science and reason. If a religion does not agree with the postulates of science nor accord with the regulations of reason it is a bundle of superstitions; a phantasm of the brain. Science and religion are realities, and if that religion to which we adhere be a reality it must needs conform to the fundamental reality of all things.  https://bahai-library.com/Writings (go to #73)
Read more